我如何评价江泽民

 我如何评价江泽民

作者：大包王朝

评价江泽民不如评价邓小平，因为江胡习，就算是包子，到现在为止还没有跳脱邓小平改革开放的框架。

1.以多长时间的历史维度来评价江泽民，20年还是200年？

2.江泽民的自我评价->政治遗产，打破终身制失败

3.下岗与加入WTO

4.计划生育

5.法轮功与活摘器官

6.腐败

1.以多长时间的历史维度来评价江泽民，20年还是200年？

20年的维度来看改革开放是正确的。

200年的维度是错误的。

福泽谕吉说人心，制度，器物。对应中国历史正确的顺序应该是新文化运动，辛亥革命，洋务运动。但中国历史是反着的。文革后的启蒙伤痕文学，河殇相当于新文化运动，六四相当于辛亥革命但失败。结果邓小平又搞洋务运动，就是改革开放。葬送了中国的前途。贫穷就是社会主义，如果搞个富裕的社会主义，就是怪胎，那么财富注定清零。中国越富就越失败，就越是在通往悬崖的道路狂奔。清零/房地产泡沫/被美军胖揍就是结束改开<洋务运动>的甲午海战。越有钱越觉得中国那些垃圾文化好，越没法拥抱真正的文明价值观。洋务运动>>辛亥革命>>新文化运动。河殇>>六四>>改开。中国死循环了两次，没有任何进步。

其实，温家宝也是大概这个思路。他说，没有政治改革，经济改革的结果也要失去。

中国不先搞新文化运动，不先搞启蒙运动，没有人心的改变。

搞改革开放就是错的，中国富起来了，没有制度的保证，最后也会财富清零。

习近平只是或多或少加速了这个进程而已，社会主义的本质就是贫穷，包子就想回到这种原教旨的社会主义状态。

所以我们首先要确定用多少年的时间维度来评价毛泽东，邓小平，江泽民。

我们看毛邓江是如何自我评价

2.江泽民的自我评价->政治遗产，打破终身制失败

毛泽东的自我评价就是我一生干了两件事，一是与蒋介石斗了那么几十年，把他赶到那么几个海岛上去了。另一件事你们都知道，就是发动‘文化大革命’。

邓小平的自我评价，好几条都是承认反右错了，这是对历史的交代。对未来，1993年夏，邓小平就《邓小平文选》第三卷的出版事宜，特别提到：“我们一直在做的事，不能动摇。就是要坚持，不能改变这条路线”

对比毛邓，就很容易评价江泽民了。邓小平之后，经过江胡习三个人，改革开放才开始破产，还没有彻底破产。如果把包子三连任作为邓小平最重要的政治遗产，打破最高领导人终身制失败的话。邓小平1997年死后，到2022年，是25年。

如果以25年的维度，邓小平的政治路线维持了25年，而毛泽东1976年9月9日死了，10月6日，四人帮被抓，毛泽东的政治遗产维持了不到一个月。

江泽民呢？

江泽民自己的总结是：“到了北京我干了这十几年也没有什么别的，大概三件事。一个，确立了社会主义市场经济。第二个，把邓小平理论列入党章。第三个，就是‘三个代表’。如果说还有一点成绩，就是军队一律不得经商，这个对军队的命运有很大的关系。因为我后来又干了一年零八个月，等于我在部队干了15年军委主席。还有98年的抗洪也是很大的。但是这些都是次要的，我主要的就是三件事情。”（视察中国联合工程公司时的谈话，2009年4月23日，杭州）

就按照他自己说的这三件事情，来看时间线

2004年9月19日，江泽民辞去军委主席。

2021年11月11日，包子试图在十九届六中全会拿掉邓小平理论和三个代表失败。

2022年10月3日，江泽民放出生日照片。

2022年10月22日，胡锦涛被包子从二十大会场拖走。

2022年11月30日，江泽民死了。

胡锦涛被包子拖走的那一刻，等于邓小平江泽民的政治遗产也被拖走了。

邓，江，胡都退休了，只有包子不退休，那江泽民退休不就是个笑话吗？

等于江泽民死前一个月，自己的政治遗产就破产了。还不如早死3个月呢。

眼不见心不烦。白撑这3个月，说是江泽民被包子拔管了，还不如说他被包子活活气死了。

总结：

毛泽东的政治遗产：文革，死后维持了不到一个月。

从1976年9月9日，腊肉死了到10月6日四人帮被抓。

邓小平的政治遗产：改革开放和打破最高领导人终身制，死后维持25年。

1997年2月19日死了，到2022年10月22日，胡锦涛被包子从二十大会场拖走。

江泽民的政治遗产：打破最高领导人终身制，死前一个月就失败了。

2022年10月22日，胡锦涛被包子从二十大会场拖走。2022年11月30日，江泽民死了。

其实本文到此为止就可以结束了。其他几个问题重要吗？

3.下岗与加入WTO

4.计划生育

5.法轮功与活摘器官

6.腐败

3.下岗与加入WTO

下岗工人这个问题，公有制本来就是万恶之源。江泽民和朱镕基唯一做错的就是下岗的工人还不够多，消灭国企还不够彻底。消灭所有的国企就等于消灭共产党。现在的国企又重新成为了吸血中国人，给共产党输血的工具。当年朱镕基保留部分国企，就算是想将来给共产党继续输血，在当时想输血也是有心无力。

加入WTO之后，中国经济才腾飞的，如果不加入WTO，中国的GDP可能只有现在五分之一。现在包子三连任，未来搞供销社的话，拿掉邓江胡的党史地位。不仅是邓小平江泽民市场经济，改革开放的破产，也是美国民主党对华政策的破产。毕竟当初是克林顿让中国加入WTO的，希望中国经济发展走向民主化道路，完全失败，一厢情愿，或者本来就是言不由衷的谎言。

所以说，改革开放在20年的历史维度是正确的，在200年的历史维度是完全错误的。是走了一段历史的弯路。不搞新文化运动，搞什么洋务运动？不搞政治改革，民主化改革，搞什么经济改革？按照温家宝的说法，最终经济改革的成果，也守不住。就是今天包子清零把中国经济搞崩溃，这是必然的。当然了，也有人说，不是清零，而是人口老龄化和金融泡沫搞垮了中国经济。

中国喜欢碰瓷日本，拿日本的老龄化和经济停滞说事儿，说未富先老。中国有什么资格和日本比？连马云这样的首富都如丧家之犬，躲在东京。日本有民主法治，中国有个屁啊？

中国就是把经济大厦建在了沙子的基础之上，现在包子这股逆流一来，就冲垮了。

还有就是碰瓷拉美，说中国拉美化，拉美都是民主国家好吧。

中国连首富的基本身家性命都无法保障，还到处碰瓷。

4.计划生育

5.法轮功与活摘器官

这件事情我手头有一份刑事证据。我会慢慢的整理出版。这份证据还不是活摘器官，而是军队大规模参与器官买卖的案件。毕竟，移植器官不是在小作坊就能做的手术，而是需要大医院。这份证据中，有供体和受体的姓名，军队参与器官买卖做手术的医生的名单。

关键还不是江泽民时期，而是胡锦涛和习近平当军委主席副主席时期的事情。

活摘是从江泽民开始的，但是胡锦涛和习近平也没有停止啊。

很多事情要搞清因果关系。

不要用结果去解释原因，没有法轮功这件事，中国没有民主的制度，法治的制度，贩卖器官和腐败也会存在的。

6.腐败

腐败根本就不一个问题，说江泽民时期腐败开始严重，有点用结果来解释原因了。只是因为江泽民时期中国经济刚好开始发展而已。包子清零三年按理说应该让一部人清醒了。腐败也就是一种税收的形式而已。拉美不太成功的民主国家也有腐败，应该用法律去治理。

所以中国去碰瓷拉美国家干吗？人家首富起码不用跑路。首富的安全都得不到保障，何谈普通人？

包子这种选择性反腐，打击政敌，当作集权的工具。凭借王岐山反腐之势，拿下孙政才，最后三连任，清零让你工作没了，饭都吃不上。清零和腐败，哪个罪恶更大呢？

郭文贵爆料让王岐山的腐败大白天下。包子本身也很腐败。

拿腐败出来说事儿就是傻逼。

最腐败的就是邓家贵和齐桥桥的稀土产业和齐安安和吴龙的核酸产业。

不把习近平抓了的反腐败都是假的反腐败。

明明是选择性反腐，为了包子终身连任集权，还支持反腐败不是傻逼是什么？

在没有民主化的中国支持反腐败就等于支持习近平选择性反腐集权，就等于支持习近平搞独裁。

腐败不腐败的，决定不了一个国家和民族的前途和命运，但是独裁可以。或者说腐败只是结果，只是现象，不是原因。

How do I evaluate Jiang Zemin

Evaluating Jiang Zemin is not as good as evaluating Deng Xiaoping, because Jiang Huxi, even Baozi, has not yet escaped Deng Xiaoping's reform and opening up framework.

1. How long is the historical dimension to evaluate Jiang Zemin, 20 years or 200 years?

2. Jiang Zemin's self-evaluation -> political legacy, failure to break tenure

3. Laid-off and entry into WTO

4. Family planning

5. Falun Gong and Live Organ Harvesting

6. Corruption

1. How long is the historical dimension to evaluate Jiang Zemin, 20 years or 200 years?

From the perspective of 20 years, the reform and opening up is correct.

The 200-year dimension is wrong.

Fukuzawa Yukichi talked about people's hearts, systems, and utensils. The correct sequence corresponding to Chinese history should be the New Culture Movement, the Revolution of 1911, and the Westernization Movement. But Chinese history is the other way around. For the Enlightenment scar literature after the Cultural Revolution, He Shang is equivalent to the New Culture Movement, and June Fourth is equivalent to the Revolution of 1911 but failed. As a result, Deng Xiaoping launched the Westernization Movement again, that is, reform and opening up. ruined the future of China. Poverty is socialism. If a rich socialism is built, it is a freak, and wealth is destined to be wiped out. The richer China is, the more it will fail, and the more it will run wildly on the road to the cliff. Clearing/real estate bubble/being beaten up by the U.S. military is the end of the Sino-Japanese War of Sino-Japanese War. The richer you are, the more you feel that China's garbage culture is good, and the less you can embrace the real civilized values. Westernization Movement >> Revolution of 1911 >> New Culture Movement. He Shang>>June 4th>>reopened. China has gone through an endless loop twice without any progress.

In fact, Wen Jiabao probably had the same idea. He said that without political reform, the results of economic reform would also be lost.

If China does not start with the New Culture Movement or the Enlightenment Movement, there will be no change in people's hearts.

It is wrong to carry out reform and opening up. China has become rich, and without the guarantee of the system, the wealth will eventually be wiped out.

Xi Jinping has only more or less accelerated this process. The essence of socialism is poverty, and Baozi wants to return to this fundamental socialist state.

Therefore, we must first determine how many years to use to evaluate Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping, and Jiang Zemin.

Let's see how Mao Dengjiang evaluates himself

2. Jiang Zemin's self-evaluation -> political legacy, failure to break tenure

Mao Zedong’s self-assessment is that I have done two things in my life. One is to fight against Chiang Kai-shek for so many decades and drive him to so many islands. Another thing you all know is to launch the 'Cultural Revolution'.

In Deng Xiaoping's self-evaluation, several items admitted that the anti-rightist movement was wrong, which is an account of history. Regarding the future, in the summer of 1993, Deng Xiaoping specifically mentioned about the publication of the third volume of "Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping": "What we have been doing all along cannot be shaken. We must persist and cannot change this line."

Compared with Mao Deng, it is easy to evaluate Jiang Zemin. After Deng Xiaoping, after Jiang, Hu, and Xi, the reform and opening up began to go bankrupt, and it has not yet completely gone bankrupt. If Baozi's third re-election is regarded as Deng Xiaoping's most important political legacy, breaking the life tenure of the supreme leader fails. After Deng Xiaoping died in 1997, it will be 25 years until 2022.

If we take a 25-year dimension, Deng Xiaoping’s political line lasted for 25 years, and Mao Zedong died on September 9, 1976. On October 6, the Gang of Four was arrested, and Mao Zedong’s political legacy lasted less than a month.

What about Jiang Zemin?

Jiang Zemin’s own summary is: “When I arrived in Beijing, I have done nothing else for more than ten years. There are about three things. One is to establish a socialist market economy. The second is to include Deng Xiaoping Theory in the party constitution. The third , is the "Three Represents". If there is still a little achievement, the army is not allowed to do business. I have served as the chairman of the Military Commission for 15 years. The 1998 flood fight is also very important. But these are secondary, and my main focus is on three things." (Talk during inspection of China United Engineering Corporation, April 23, 2009 , Hangzhou)

Just look at the timeline according to the three things he said

On September 19, 2004, Jiang Zemin resigned as chairman of the Military Commission.

On November 11, 2021, Baozi tried to get rid of Deng Xiaoping Theory and the Three Representatives at the Sixth Plenary Session of the Nineteenth Central Committee and failed.

On October 3, 2022, Jiang Zemin released his birthday photos.

On October 22, 2022, Hu Jintao was dragged away from the 20th Congress by Baozi.

On November 30, 2022, Jiang Zemin died.

The moment Hu Jintao was dragged away by Baozi, it was equivalent to the political legacy of Deng Xiaoping and Jiang Zemin being dragged away.

Deng, Jiang, and Hu all retired, but Baozi did not. Isn't Jiang Zemin's retirement a joke?

One month before Jiang Zemin died, his political legacy went bankrupt. Might as well die 3 months sooner.

Out of sight out of mind. For nothing to support these three months, it is better to say that Jiang Zemin was extubated by Baozi, rather than saying that he was mad at him to death by Baozi.

Summarize:

Mao Zedong's political legacy: the Cultural Revolution, lasted less than a month after his death.

From September 9, 1976, when Ba Rou died to October 6, when the Gang of Four was arrested.

Deng Xiaoping's Legacy: Reform and Opening Up and the Breaking of the Supreme Leader's Lifetime Tenure. It lasts for 25 years after death.

He died on February 19, 1997, and on October 22, 2022, Hu Jintao was dragged away from the 20th Congress by Baozi.

Jiang Zemin's political legacy: Breaking the life tenure of the supreme leader, which was defeated one month before his death.

On October 22, 2022, Hu Jintao was dragged away from the 20th Congress by Baozi. On November 30, 2022, Jiang Zemin died.

In fact, this article can end here. Are the other few questions important?

3. Laid-off and entry into WTO

4. Family planning

5. Falun Gong and Live Organ Harvesting

6. Corruption

3. Laid-off and entry into WTO

Regarding the issue of laid-off workers, public ownership is the root of all evil. The only thing Jiang Zemin and Zhu Rongji did wrong was that not enough workers were laid off, and the elimination of state-owned enterprises was not thorough enough. Eliminating all state-owned enterprises is tantamount to eliminating the Communist Party. The current state-owned enterprises have once again become a tool for the blood-sucking Chinese to give blood to the Communist Party. Back then, Zhu Rongji retained some state-owned enterprises. Even if he wanted to continue blood transfusions to the Communist Party in the future, he was powerless at the time.

After joining the WTO, China's economy took off. If it did not join the WTO, China's GDP may only be one-fifth of what it is now. Now that Baozi has been re-elected for the third time, if a supply and marketing cooperative is established in the future, Deng Jianghu's status in party history will be removed. Not only the bankruptcy of Deng Xiaoping and Jiang Zemin's market economy, reform and opening up, but also the bankruptcy of the US Democratic Party's China policy. It is hoped that China's economic development will move towards democratization, a complete failure, wishful thinking, or an insincere lie.

Therefore, reform and opening up is correct in the historical dimension of 20 years, but completely wrong in the historical dimension of 200 years. It is a detour in history. Instead of engaging in the New Culture Movement, what kind of Westernization Movement? If we don’t engage in political reforms or democratization reforms, what kind of economic reforms should we engage in? According to Wen Jiabao, the final results of economic reform cannot be kept. It is inevitable that the clearing of steamed stuffed buns will collapse the Chinese economy today. Of course, some people say that it is not cleared, but the aging population and financial bubbles have brought down the Chinese economy.

China likes to talk about Japan, talking about Japan's aging and economic stagnation, and saying that it gets old before it gets rich. What qualifications does China have to compare with Japan? Even the richest man like Ma Yun is like a bereaved dog, hiding in Tokyo. Japan has democracy and the rule of law, but China has a fart?

China has built its economic building on the foundation of sand, and now when the countercurrent of Baozi comes, it will be washed away.

Another thing is to touch porcelain in Latin America, saying that China is Latin America, and Latin America is a democratic country, okay?

China can't even guarantee the basic wealth and life of the richest man, and they still touch porcelain everywhere.

4. Family planning

5. Falun Gong and Live Organ Harvesting

I have a piece of criminal evidence on this matter. I will slowly organize and publish. This evidence is not live organ harvesting, but a case of large-scale involvement of the military in organ trading. After all, organ transplantation is not an operation that can be performed in a small workshop, but requires a large hospital. Among the evidence are the names of the donors and recipients, and a list of doctors who were operated on by the military involved in the organ trade.

The key is not Jiang Zemin's period, but the period when Hu Jintao and Xi Jinping were the leaders of the Military Commission.

Live harvesting started with Jiang Zemin, but Hu Jintao and Xi Jinping did not stop.

There are many things to figure out the cause and effect relationship.

Don't use the result to explain the reason. Without Falun Gong, China would not have a democratic system, a system ruled by law, and organ trafficking and corruption would still exist.

6. Corruption

Corruption is not a problem at all. To say that corruption started to become serious during the Jiang Zemin period is a bit of an explanation of the cause with the result. It's just because China's economy just started to develop during Jiang Zemin's period. It is reasonable to say that Baozi Qingling's three years should make some people sober. Corruption is nothing more than a form of taxation. Less successful democracies in Latin America also have corruption, which should be governed by law.

So why is China touching Latin American countries? At least the richest man doesn't have to run away. The safety of the richest man cannot be guaranteed, so how can we talk about ordinary people?

Baozi's selective anti-corruption campaign against political opponents is used as a tool of centralization. Relying on Wang Qishan's anti-corruption momentum, Sun Zhengcai was taken down, and he was re-elected for the last three times. Clearing up makes you lose your job and eat. Which is the greater evil, zeroing or corruption?

Guo Wengui broke the news and let Wang Qishan's corruption come to light. The buns themselves are also very corrupt.

It's stupid to talk about corruption.

Corruption or non-corruption cannot determine the future and destiny of a country or a nation. In other words, corruption is only a result, a phenomenon, not a cause.